Cursive is less popular than its counterpart of print handwriting, but its unique and arguably more stylish way of writing is making a comeback of sorts. Broadly speaking, cursive—also known as “connected” or “joined writing”—refers to a type of handwriting in which the letters of each word are connected together. Conversely, print —also known as “manuscript writing” —refers to a script in which the letters of each word are written within close proximity but are not connected or joined together.
Over a decade ago, numerous states adopted academic standards calling for students to learn how to handwrite the alphabet in print by the end of first grade (National Governors Association & Council of Chief State School Officers, 2010). Notably, handwriting the alphabet in cursive was not incorporated into those standards. Recently, many states have addressed this omission through introducing new standards and/or legislation. In the last year alone, new standards for cursive handwriting have been adopted by several states, including in Iowa (Iowa Department of Education, 2024), Oklahoma (H.B. 3727, 2024), and California (A.B. 446, 2023). The Iowa English Language Arts standards call for introducing cursive in second grade and making it the main writing instruction focus in third grade (Iowa Department of Education, 2024).
Connecting the Cursive and Print Alphabet
With this renewed interest in cursive handwriting instruction, it is important to think about the best practices for introducing cursive in relation to print handwriting instruction. One of the defining features that separates cursive from print handwriting is the use of curved or flat letter strokes to connect letters. In addition to learning how to connect letters, students must learn how to form cursive letters, which can differ drastically from their print versions. For example, the letters “b” and “s” look different if written in cursive or print. It is estimated that upwards of 70% of letters differ in overall shape and letter strokes if written in cursive or print (Graham, 1992).
It is likely preferable to wait to teach cursive handwriting until after students learn print handwriting. For some early-elementary students, trying to learn cursive handwriting while still learning print handwriting may cause unneeded confusion. Focusing first on print instruction explicitly promotes the connection between reading and writing for early-elementary students. Specifically, students are typically taught to read words in print and not cursive, so teaching print handwriting alongside print reading allows students to make connections between letter identification and formation (Ray et al., 2022). More research has been produced about print handwriting than cursive (Datchuk & Kubina, 2013; Santangelo & Graham, 2016), but results from a small number of studies suggest early-elementary students benefit from a solid foundation in print before moving onto cursive.
In one study (Wolf et al., 2017), early-elementary students who received sustained print handwriting instruction in first and second grades outperformed students who received split instruction (i.e., print handwriting in first grade and cursive handwriting in second grade) on measures of handwriting fluency and spelling accuracy. It is likely that cursive handwriting instruction is more beneficial in later elementary grades. One study found cursive handwriting can contribute to both spelling and overall composition in upper-elementary and intermediate grades, fourth to seventh grade (Alstad et al., 2015).
Results from these studies (e.g., Alstad et al., 2015; Wolf et al., 2017) suggest a primary focus on print in early-elementary with a gradual introduction in later elementary, which roughly corresponds to when cursive handwriting is typically introduced to students in the United States (Bara & Morin, 2013). Expectations on when to start cursive handwriting varies across the states. For example, California students are expected to learn cursive handwriting sometime between first and sixth grade (A.B. 446, 2023), while Iowa students begin cursive in second grade with a main focus in third grade (Iowa Department of Education, 2024) and Oklahoma students begin in third grade (H.B. 3727, 2024). It is important to note, however, that cursive handwriting is introduced as early as kindergarten or the first year of schooling in some countries (Bara & Morin, 2013). Currently, the research base lacks robust evidence on differences in print and cursive handwriting across different countries and languages. Put simply, more research is needed on the most efficient and effective milestones for handwriting development.
Is it the Style or the Instruction?
There are a variety of different cursive handwriting programs on the market for caregivers and teachers interested in handwriting instruction. Many are available for purchase as a standalone handwriting program or are integrated into a larger literacy curriculum. However, as districts, teachers, and caregivers consider the importance of cursive handwriting instruction, they may wonder about the differences across these programs and if one is a better fit than another for their students.
Handwriting programs include not only materials (e.g., lined paper or software applications) but also suggested instructional procedures (e.g., modeling and guided practice) and specific styles of cursive and print. Common handwriting styles for print and cursive include D’Nealian, Zaner-Bloser, and Handwriting Without Tears. Each style has slight differences in letter formation (i.e., shape of alphabet letters), connecting strokes (i.e., curved and flat strokes joining cursive letters), and slant (i.e., upward or tilted). In part, the different types of handwriting styles were developed to make the act of handwriting easier to learn for students. However, it is unclear whether style affects students’ ability to learn cursive handwriting.
There is one main difficulty in answering this question: Prior studies have typically not examined style separate from the instructional procedures used to teach handwriting. In other words, is it the style that makes it easier for students to learn or is it simply the instructional support provided? Research related to handwriting programs is limited, but studies show there appears to be no significant differences in programs related to students’ cursive or print handwriting improvement (Engel et al., 2018; Shimel et al., 2009).
Although more research is needed to fully understand the differences between the types of handwriting programs available, targeted handwriting instruction for students, regardless of the program, can be beneficial (Limpo & Graham, 2020). There are several specific components that may be particularly beneficial for learning cursive handwriting, including:
delivering instruction in a systematic and explicit manner (i.e., teachers model appropriate letter formation, lead students through guided practice, and test for independence)
providing students opportunities to retrieve the letter shapes and names from memory (e.g., students see models of each cursive letter, say the letter name, and then try to write the cursive letter from memory)
composing cursive letters not only in isolation but within words—importantly, part of cursive handwriting is learning how to use connecting strokes to join letters within words
Currently, the IRRC offers a free eLearning module and application for teachers interested in print handwriting—LIFTER (Letter Identification and Formation for Transcription and Early Reading).
By summer 2025, the IRRC plans to offer an additional eLearning module and application specific to cursive handwriting—CLIFTER (Cursive Letter Identification and Formation for Transcription and Early Reading). In addition to reproducible cursive handwriting activities, the module and application will have many interactive features, including video models of letter name, sound, and formation within words. With these tools, educators can not only implement cursive handwriting instruction but make important connections to reading cursive text.
References
A.B. 446, 2023–2024 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Cal. 2023), https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB446
Alstad, Z., Sanders, E., Abbott, R. D., Barnett, A. L., Henderson, S. E., Connelly, V., & Berninger, V. W. (2015). Modes of alphabet letter production during middle childhood and adolescence: Interrelationships with each other and other writing skills. Journal of Writing Research 6(3), 199-231. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.06.03.1
Bara, F., & Morin, M.-F. (2013). Does the handwriting style learned in first grade determine the style used in the fourth and fifth grades and influence handwriting speed and quality? A Comparison between French and Quebec Children. Psychology in the Schools, 50(6), 601–617. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.uiowa.edu/10.1002/pits.21691
Datchuk, S. M., & Kubina, R. M. (2013). A review of teaching sentence-level writing skills to students with writing difficulties and learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 34(3), 180-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512448254
Engel, C., Lillie, K., Zurawski, S., & Travers, B. G. (2018). Curriculum-based handwriting programs: A systematic review with effect sizes. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(3), https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2018.027110
Graham, S. (1992). Issues in handwriting instruction. Focus on Exceptional Children, 25(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v25i2.7543
H.B. 3727, 2024 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Okla. 2024), http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/cf_pdf/2023-24%20ENR/hB/HB3727%20ENR.PDF
Iowa Department of Education. (2024). Iowa Literacy Standards Documents. https://educate.iowa.gov/pk-12/standards/academics/literacy
Limpo, T., & Graham, S. (2020). The role of handwriting instruction in writers’ education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(3), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1692127
Morin, M. F., Lavoie, N., & Montésinos-Gelet, I. (2012). The effects of manuscript, cursive or manuscript/cursive styles on writing development in Grade 2. Language and Literacy, 14(1), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.20360/G21S3V
Ray, K., Dally, K., Rowlandson, L., Tam, K. I., & Lane, A. E. (2022). The relationship of handwriting ability and literacy in kindergarten: a systematic review. Reading and Writing, 35(5), 1119-1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10224-8
Santangelo, T., & Graham, S. (2016). A comprehensive meta-analysis of handwriting instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 225-265.
Shimel, K., Candler, C., & Neville-Smith, M. (2009). Comparison of cursive handwriting instruction programs among students without identified problems. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 29(2), 170-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942630902784738
Wolf, B., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2017). Effective beginning handwriting instruction: Multi-modal, consistent format for 2 years, and linked to spelling and composing. Reading and Writing, 30, 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9674-4